Artificial intelligence isn’t just a buzzword in cybersecurity—it’s rapidly becoming the backbone of both offense and defense in the digital battlefield. From hyper-realistic deepfakes to machine learning-powered threat detection, AI is fundamentally changing how we manage cyber exposure.
But this transition also introduces a dilemma: for every AI tool that empowers security teams to detect threats faster, there’s another enabling bad actors to automate and scale their campaigns faster. The result? A new era of cyber risk—one that’s faster-moving, harder to detect, and more deeply intertwined with emerging technologies.
AI technology is reshaping the cyber threat landscape, and we’ve got a breakdown below to separate what’s real today from what’s still on the horizon. We’ll explore the implications for organizations managing their attack vectors, the limits of current AI capabilities, and what cybersecurity teams need to do to stay ahead.
Because in a world where cyber threats are learning to think for themselves, our defenses must get smarter too.
5 Major Third-Party Risk Management Challenges Fixed with AI
Navigate this crowded landscape by diving into the top five challenges in third-party risk management and explaining how the right AI-driven solution can make all the difference.
AI-powered attacks: Cyber threats are evolving
Let’s start with cybercriminals' offensive approach: the rise of artificial intelligence-powered cyberattacks. Thanks to the growing use of generative AI, machine learning, and deep learning—the next generation of cyber threats is faster, more convincing, and increasingly difficult to detect.
Deepfakes, automated phishing, and adversarial AI
Generative AI has dramatically raised the stakes for social engineering. Deepfake technology, once limited to hobbyist experimentation, is now being weaponized in spear phishing attacks and impersonation campaigns. Attackers can create hyper-realistic videos and audio clips that mimic the tone, cadence, and appearance of executives or public figures in real time—a deepfake that is almost impossible to distinguish from the real thing.
Meanwhile, large language models (LLMs) are making it easier than ever to generate phishing emails that are grammatically flawless, contextually relevant, and even personalized. These AI-crafted messages evade traditional spam filters and are tailored to targets’ roles, behaviors, or interests—raising the likelihood of a successful breach and theft of sensitive information.
Adversarial AI is also emerging as a concern, with hackers deliberately manipulating the inputs of machine learning models to trigger incorrect outputs. These subtle changes can cause image recognition systems to misclassify inputs or force anomaly detection tools to overlook malicious activity—undermining trust in automated security systems.
Real-world examples
While these examples of AI-powered cyberattacks might seem few and far between, numerous cases already exist across various sectors. Recent cases of cyberattacks using AI include:
- Gmail users targeted via advanced AI-phishing campaign (2025): Attackers leveraged AI to craft compelling phishing emails targeting Gmail users. These emails utilized AI to generate content that closely mimicked legitimate communications, making them more persuasive and harder to detect.
- UK energy firm defrauded by Deepfake-based CEO impersonation (2019): The CEO of a UK-based energy firm was defrauded of €220,000 after malicious actors used AI-generated audio to mimic his boss’s voice, instructing him to transfer funds to a fraudulent account.
- AI-malware, SugarGh0st RAT, targets AI experts (2024): A cyberespionage campaign utilized the SugarGh0st Remote Access Trojan (RAT), an AI-enhanced malware, to target U.S. AI experts. The attackers employed AI to enhance the malware’s capabilities, enabling it to adapt and evade traditional security measures.
Additionally, we are seeing increasing reports on cybercrime forums of attackers using open-source LLMs like LLaMA or fine-tuned versions of ChatGPT to write malware code, craft convincing phishing templates, or generate fake identities at scale. The barrier to entry for sophisticated attacks is dropping—fast.
Brand protection and identity security implications
These developments present significant challenges for an organization’s brand protection and identity security. As deepfakes and impersonation attacks become more common, organizations must contend with the growing risk of reputational damage, financial loss, and erosion of customer trust that stems from AI-powered cyberattacks.
Understanding how to protect your brand should be top of mind as we enter this new age of cyber exposure. Proper preparation now could mean the difference between a headline article detailing how one of your team members fell victim to a deepfake scam and successfully avoiding the situation altogether. Continuously monitor your organization’s external footprint, including the following:
- Spoofed domains
- Unauthorized brand mentions
- Fake social media profiles
- Leaked credentials used in impersonation or fraud campaigns
AI-driven threat detection and response: A smarter defense
Let’s switch over to defense and explore how cybersecurity professionals are equipping their teams with AI solutions. AI-powered tools are transforming how organizations detect, prioritize, and respond to threats—making it possible to keep pace in this increasingly complex threat landscape.
Machine learning for anomaly detection
Traditional rule-based security tools often fall short in identifying novel or subtle attack patterns. Machine learning changes the game by enabling systems to learn what “normal” looks like in specific environments and then detect deviations from that baseline. These behavioral analytics allow defenders to uncover previously unknown threats—such as threat intelligence, credential misuse, or lateral movement—based on anomalies, not just known indicators of compromise.
Beyond improved detection, AI also helps reduce alert fatigue—a persistent problem in many security operations centers (SOCs). Machine learning algorithms allow analysts to focus on the alerts that truly matter by correlating volumes of data across systems and filtering out false positives. This smarter prioritization helps prevent critical signals from getting lost in the noise.
AI assistants for SOC teams
Another transformative application of AI in cybersecurity is the rise of AI-powered assistants—powerful tools designed to act as copilots for security professionals. These assistants can rapidly triage alerts, summarize complex threat data, write detection rules, or even generate investigation timelines from unstructured logs.
These capabilities are invaluable for security teams that are stretched thin. AI’s ability to speed up mean time to detect (MTTD) improves incident response prioritization and frees up analysts to focus on high-impact work instead of repetitive, time-consuming tasks. Keep in mind that AI doesn’t replace human analysts—it makes them faster, smarter, and more effective.
As the volume and sophistication of threats continue to grow, AI-driven threat detection and response isn’t just nice to have—it’s becoming essential infrastructure for any modern cybersecurity strategy.
5 Major Third-Party Risk Management Challenges Fixed with AI
Navigate this crowded landscape by diving into the top five challenges in third-party risk management and explaining how the right AI-driven solution can make all the difference.
Hype versus reality: Cutting through the noise
It’s easy to get wrapped up in all that artificial intelligence has to offer the cybersecurity ecosystem, but not all promises are created equal. Amid the excitement, it’s critical for security leaders to separate practical advancements from overhyped visions. Understanding what AI can realistically deliver today—and where it still falls short—is essential for making smart, strategic investments.
What’s real versus what’s hype
There’s no doubt that AI is already making measurable improvements in cybersecurity. Tools powered by machine learning are helping organizations detect threats earlier through predictive analytics, automate routine response actions, and intelligently correlate massive datasets across their attack surface. These capabilities are not just theoretical—they’re being deployed right now to reduce response times, lower risk exposure, and improve vulnerability mitigation.
However, it’s important to temper expectations. AI is not a fully autonomous cybersecurity solution that can detect, respond to, and resolve every potential threat without human oversight. Despite the positive impact of AI, we’re still very far from artificial intelligence replacing security analysts entirely or creating a “set-it-and-forget-it” defense system.
Many AI systems require significant tuning, quality data inputs, and ongoing human interpretation to be effective. Relying too heavily on automation without understanding its limitations can create blind spots or lead to missed signals. At its best, AI is a powerful augmentation tool—not a silver bullet.
Security leaders must stay grounded in what AI can actually do today and avoid chasing speculative futures. Pair cutting-edge tools with human expertise; don’t expect machines to do it all.
Real-world barriers
Even the most advanced AI models face limitations that security leaders must be aware of. These limitations include:
- Data quality: Machine learning is only as effective as its training data. Incomplete, biased, or unstructured data can skew outcomes, limit threat visibility, or introduce new vulnerabilities.
- Explainability: Many AI-driven systems operate as “black boxes,” making decisions that aren’t always transparent or understandable. This lack of explainability makes it difficult for teams to validate findings, meet compliance standards, or build trust in AI-driven insights.
- Model drift: The threat landscape evolves rapidly. AI models trained on yesterday’s data may become outdated quickly if not continuously retrained. Without proper model maintenance, even accurate systems will degrade over time.
Over-automation risks
As tempting as it may be to lean heavily on automation for cybersecurity tools, over-reliance on AI can create new risks. “Set-it-and-forget-it” approaches often overlook the importance of human context, ethical considerations, and critical thinking in security decision-making.
For example, an AI system might flag unusual user behavior without recognizing it’s part of a planned change in network traffic—or worse, fail to alert on a novel attack simply because it hasn’t seen a similar pattern before. Human oversight is essential for interpreting results, making nuanced decisions, and ensuring that responses align with broader business goals and risk tolerance.
The takeaway? AI should augment human decision-making—not replace it. CISOs and security teams must strike a balance between automation and expert judgment, ensuring AI serves as a powerful ally rather than a potential liability.
Looking ahead: What security leaders should be doing now
As the use of AI grows across the cybersecurity field, one thing is certain—AI isn’t a silver bullet, but it is an essential part of the modern security stack. Rather than viewing it as a standalone solution or a futuristic luxury, security leaders should treat AI as a force multiplier that works best when integrated thoughtfully into existing processes and teams.
To stay ahead of new threats and avoid falling into the trap of overhyped promises, organizations should consider the following proactive steps:
- Invest in AI-augmented tools with proven performance: Prioritize solutions that use AI to enhance—not overtake—core security functions like threat detection, vulnerability prioritization, and incident response. Look for measurable outcomes and clear ROI, not just flashy AI branding.
- Train staff to work alongside AI, not be replaced by it: Upskill your teams to collaborate effectively with AI-powered systems, including understanding how to interpret outputs, validate insights, and act on automated recommendations while maintaining human oversight and context.
- Evaluate vendors’ transparency around AI: Scrutinize how vendors train, tune, and maintain their AI models. Transparent practices around data sources, model updates, and explainability will help you make informed decisions and avoid black-box risks.
- Reaffirm a holistic approach to cyber exposure: AI should support a broader strategy focused on visibility, continuous risk monitoring, and actionable insights across your digital ecosystem. Shiny new features mean little without an understanding of your organization’s external risk surface.
Ultimately, the best security programs are those that blend innovation with intention. Those who embrace AI smartly—balancing automation with human insight—will be better equipped to navigate an ever-changing threat landscape.
How UpGuard helps: Turn AI awareness into action
Artificial intelligence is undeniably transforming how we manage cyber exposure, bringing with it unprecedented risks and powerful new tools. As threat actors become more sophisticated and attack surfaces expand, the benefit of AI to rapidly detect, assess, and respond to external threats is no longer optional—it’s mission-critical.
At UpGuard, we believe the organizations that will thrive in this new era are those that embrace AI thoughtfully, striking the right balance between intelligent automation and human oversight. That’s exactly what we built UpGuard Breach Risk to do.
UpGuard Breach Risk is our solution for proactively managing cybersecurity risks, integrating critical features in a user-friendly platform that enhances your organization’s security posture.
Breach Risk helps you understand the risks impacting your external security posture and ensures your assets are constantly monitored and protected. View your organization’s cybersecurity at a glance and communicate internally about risks, vulnerabilities, or current security incidents.
Explore how UpGuard Breach Risk can help protect your business at https://www.upguard.com/contact-sales.
